Little Jaffna review: Despite of being technically sound the film's lack of narrative is felt throughout

In this review, cinetasticc aka Yash gives us a detailed version of how Little Jaffna didn't quite work out for him!

Little Jaffna, directed by Lawrence Valin, is set in Paris and follows undercover policeman Michael, who infiltrates a Tamil criminal gang to take down their leader, Aya. Before the screening, Valin mentioned that the film took seven years to make, and while the technical aspects reflect this effort, I wish the same could be said for the narrative.

Michael starts as an undercover waiter at a small restaurant in Little Jaffna, a frequent hangout spot for the gang. He quickly and somewhat conveniently gains access to the gang and, ultimately, to Aya. Once he is accepted as one of them, the stakes stop escalating. Michael collects and passes information with little difficulty, and the antagonist offers minimal threat. Despite the film's attempt to explore the inner workings of the gang and present the reality from an outsider’s perspective, this aspect doesn’t surface effectively and continuously drowns under its own weight.

Also Read: Burden of Dreams Review: A meta-commentary on the weight of filmmaking ambitions!

The technical team deserves credit for making the film engaging, with creative elements that maintain the audience's attention. Although the soundtrack is occasionally questionable yet it adds a layer of "coolness" to some sequences. Despite its 97-minute runtime, the film loses momentum at times, not due to the editing—arguably the standout aspect—but because of the confusing third act. The film takes us to new places, only to lead us back to safe, predictable outcomes.

We’re shown both perspectives—Michael, who believes funding war perpetuates a never-ending cycle, and the criminal gang, who are willing to fight for their people by any means necessary. However, the film ultimately aligns itself more with Michael's view, forgetting its earlier attempt at balance. By the end, I wish I could feel that Michael had achieved what he needed, but he only accomplished what he wanted. His deeper need—fighting for equal rights and standing shoulder to shoulder with others—remains unfulfilled. The writing makes him seem like a confused kid who never truly understands what he wants. If Michael is meant to be an anti-hero, why is he portrayed as a hero who sacrifices without facing any meaningful obstacles?

In an alternate version of the film, I would have preferred to see Michael making a different choice, one that provokes more compelling questions. His current choice leaves the audience confused and not of the good kind. While Michael might be conflicted, the film also hints that he has a firm grip on his decisions, which creates inconsistency in his character and the overall writing.

Little Jaffna had its Indian premiere at the MAMI Mumbai Film Festival this year! 

For more reviews, follow us on @socialketchupbinge